Tract 4870 Development Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-001-04 (ITP) Minor Amendment No. 1)

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1984051409
Lead Agency
Fresno County
Document Title
Tract 4870 Development Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-001-04 (ITP) Minor Amendment No. 1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/30/2016
Document Description
This Amendment makes no specific changes to the ITP as originally issued. Rather, this Amendment incorporates clarifying language regarding the merged management of the Habitat Management lands and the merged endowment account which will fund the management of the Habitat Management (HM) lands, and to describe responsibilities and liabilities with respect to the HM lands. The Project-related impacts tot he Covered Species remain the same. This project involved the development of 83 acres with 161 residential lots and associated infrastructure improvements and preservation of open space along the White Fox Creek corridor. The project resulted in impacts to 69.94 acres of habitat for CA tiger salamander, which is designated as a threatened species under the CESA. CDFW is issuing the Amendment to the ITP referenced above as a responsible agency under the CEQA.

Contact Information

Name
Steven Hulbert
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
MILLERTON RD, WINCHELL COVE RD
Total Acres
820
Waterways
MILLERTON LAKE
Township
11S
Range
21E
Section
9+

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print