Clarksfield Development Project within Millerton New Town (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-077-04 (ITP))
Summary
SCH Number
2015129006
Lead Agency
Fresno County
Document Title
Clarksfield Development Project within Millerton New Town (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-077-04 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/21/2015
Document Description
The project will involve the development of a planned residential community over approximately 369.5 acres of non-native grasslands and oak woodlands, portions of which adjoin the seasonal White Fox Creek. Because the entire 369.5 acre Project Site does not represent habitat and because some areas will be completely avoided, the Project will result in impacts to 249.9 acres of California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) habitat, including permanent impacts to 246.5 acres of upland habitat and 2.4 acres of potential breeding habitat (one pool) for the species. The Project is expected to result in incidental take of California tiger salamander, which is designated as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.
Contact Information
Name
Steve Hulbert
Agency Name
CDFW Central Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Fresno
Other Location Info
Friant
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.