Summit Wind Repower Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0337-R3 Amendment 1)
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010082063
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
Summit Wind Repower Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0337-R3 Amendment 1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/1/2019
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wild life (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2016-0337-R3 Amendment 1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Jiddu Tapia/ Altamont Winds, LLC.
This project involves installation of up to 26 new more efficient wind turbine generators (WTG), improvements to related infrastructure and roads within an existing decommissioned wind site, and removal of existing below grade turbine foundations that obstruct placement of Project facilities.
The Amendment includes changing crossing type of SD-21 band SD-36 from Horizontal Directional Drilling to open-cut trenching. The collection lines will be placed within a 60-foot-wide work corridor for the two-collection cable run.
Contact Information
Name
Marcia Grefsrud
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Livermore
Counties
Alameda
Other Location Info
The Summit Wind Repower Project (Project) is located north of 1-580 on the western side of California's Central Valley east of Livermore within Alameda County.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No