Rio Bravo No. 3 Annexation
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004091048
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
Rio Bravo No. 3 Annexation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/22/2005
Present Land Use
R-EA (Resource-Extensive Agriculture), A (Agriculture)
Document Description
(1) A request to amend the General Plan from R-EA (Resource Extensive Agriculture) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 600 +/- acres and LMR (Low Medium Density) on 17 +/- acres and a request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to eliminate one unnamed collector street segment extending from Chase Avenue within the project site and reclassify a separate unnamed collector street segment extending from Chase Avenue within the project site and reclassify a separate unnamed collector street extending from Miramonte Drive connecting to the Rio Bravo Country Club to a local street designation; (2) a request for a concurrent zone change from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and R-1-HD (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling - Hillside Development) on 17 acres; and (3) the project also consists of an annexation into the City of Bakersfield.
Contact Information
Name
Louise Palmer
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Comanche Drive / Breckenridge Road
Total Acres
~300
State Highways
178
Airports
Rio Bravo Airport
Township
29S
Range
29E
Section
23
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.