AC Transit East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project in Alameda County
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003052070
Lead Agency
Alameda Contra Costa Transit District
(AC Transit)
Document Title
AC Transit East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project in Alameda County
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/16/2019
Document Description
The AC Transit Board approved the project on April 25, 2012. As stated in the original NOD filed April 2012, the project will provide high-level BRT service and related infrastructure along a 14.38-mile corridor connecting Berkeley-Oakland-San Leandro in Alameda County, subsequently modified to 9.5 miles from Downtown Oakland to the San Leandro BART Station. The 2014 and 2016 amendments to NOD reflected the addition of two BRT stations to project, relocation of several stations, design refinements, a BRT bus layover and operator rest facility in central Oakland, and other minor modifications. This NOD amendment reflects the relocation of the previously-proposed bus layover and operator rest facility (now referred to as the Northern Layover Facility) to a different part of central Oakland, along the west curb of San Pablo Avenue between 'Nest Grant Avenue and 20th Street, as well as changes to traffic controls including modification of a lane configuration and elimination of two traffic signals on segments of International Boulevard (SR-185), and elimination of a traffic signal on 12th Street.
Contact Information
Name
David Wilkins
Agency Name
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Name
Agency Name
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Oakland, San Leandro
Counties
Alameda
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes